Moving Beyond “Pro-Life” & “Pro-Choice”

February 15, 2011

La'tasha Mayes and Bekezela Mguni of New Voices Pittsburgh
(La’tasha Mayes and Bekezela Mguni of New Voices Pittsburgh, via NVP Facebook)

At The Root La’Tasha Mayes, executive director of Third Wave grant partner New Voices Pittsburgh, breaks down the ways our beliefs around abortion go beyond the oppositional frame of “pro-life” vs. “pro-choice:

La’Tasha Mayes, executive director of the activist group New Voices Pittsburgh: Women of Color for Reproductive Justice, says that frequent descriptions of African Americans as conservative and pro-life are an overgeneralization. She argues that it’s time the country moved beyond the pro-life versus pro-choice binary of the abortion debate.

“It’s a limiting concept that says the choices that black women make are black and white. It’s not that simple,” Mayes told The Root, adding that the broader reproductive-justice movement — for access to health insurance, family-planning services and abortion — includes women with nuanced positions who identify as both pro-life and pro-choice.

“I’ve learned that it’s about people’s individual experiences,” she says. “Regardless of her politics and religion, if a woman does not want to have a child, she will not have a child. But the message from opponents of abortion is that we can’t be trusted to make these decisions for ourselves and our families. They want to shame black women for the choices we have to make, mostly out of survival.”

Mayes rejects the idea that black women are being targeted for abortion, arguing that the conversation lacks a full sense of perspective. “The leap from abortion to black genocide is missing many steps in between,” she says. “We can’t look at abortion in isolation, as if it’s a choice made independently from the context in which black women live.

“After years of doing this work, I’ve realized that abortion becomes a choice for women when they have been socially, economically and politically marginalized in complex systems of oppression,” she continues. “If you’re not talking about race, class, sex and gender issues before you start talking about abortion, then you’re missing the larger context.”

Posted in: Blog, Criminalization, Healthcare, Media, New Voices Pittsburgh, Reproductive Justice

Written by:

4 Comments
  1. […] would it look like to move beyond “pro-life” and […]

    Pingback by What We Missed — February 15, 2011 @ 9:56 pm

  2. That’s not “moving beyond ‘pro-life’ and ‘pro-choice'” AT ALL. That’s being pro-choice.

    I hate it when people recycle the same stuff we’ve been saying for DECADES (can you say, “safe, legal, and rare”?!) and then try to repackage it and say, “oooh, now we’ve thought of this new thing that people would have been toooootally happy with women’s rights if we’d just framed it this way before.”

    Memo: the vast majority of anti-abortion activists are against women being allowed contraception, sex education, and now even life-saving medical attention. Lots of them don’t even want us to work outside the home.

    Comment by LeftSidePositive — February 16, 2011 @ 12:46 am

  3. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Steph Herold, lizvelrene, comradesvilova, Divinity33372, Lehigh389 and others. Lehigh389 said: RT @IAmDrTiller: What would it look like to move beyong "pro-life" vs #prochoice? http://git.to/21t #prochoice […]

    Pingback by Tweets that mention What would it look like to move beyong "pro-life" vs #prochoice? #prochoice -- Topsy.com — February 16, 2011 @ 6:15 pm

  4. @LeftSidePositive, this is an important conversation! Thanks for starting it.

    While I don’t disagree that the POV in La’Tasha’s quote is pro-choice, she’s also offering an additional perspective. Reproductive justice isn’t a new framing — it’s way of acknowledging that ensuring the right to a legal abortion is important, but that there’s also more to ensuring reproductive freedom than having the legal right to an abortion. Absolutely, some of the same people who would legislate abortion out of existence attack reproductive freedom more broadly — you mention sex ed and contraception, and to that I’d also add affordable healthcare, living wage work, immigration status, education, and freedom from violence in our communities. Organizations like New Voices are integral to protecting those rights and freedoms, and I’m glad to have their perspective.

    Comment by Melissa Gira Grant — February 17, 2011 @ 7:05 pm

» Leave a comment